Section A - Cooling System, continued.....
Subject: Re: Mobil 1
Date: Sun, 17 May 1998 10:15:43 -0700
From: Bob Palmer
To: Steve Laifman
References: 1
Steve,
The fan I have is from
Quest Cooling
25530 Ave Stanford #211
Valencia, CA 91355
800-272-3267
It is their 14" pusher fan with their most powerful "Teminator" motor. Price
was $110 plus tax, S&H, etc. it came to $129.63. This included a manual
switch.
They will sell you a thermostatic switch if you want it. The fan blades are
straight and without circumferential support. I don't remember what they
claimed for flow volume, maybe 1000cfm. It does have a shroud that permits a
seal against the radiator. I had to use some rubber to get mine to seal
because
I couldn't get the thing to lie completely flat against the radiator without
bending or cutting some sheet metal.
I did a quick search on the Web and came up with lots of info on Mobil 1 and
related subjects. Haven't found a reference to the "Mobil 1 fiasco" yet, but
there does seem to be agreement that seals start to leak when you switch from
regular to synthetics. Here is one example of the kind of thing you find when
you search on "Mobil 1 synthetic oil".
>
> Posted by Nix on April 02, 1998 at 16:54:54:
> In Reply to: Re: Mobil 1 Synthetic Oil posted by Mark on April 02, 1998 at
> 11:07:29:
> : : Rob might have been talking about switching from regular oil to a
> synthetic one in a seasoned motor as opposed to the obviously new engine
> mentioned in the original post. I've also heard that switching to synthetics
> in a motor that has run normal oil for a considerable amount of time is not
> advisable because the seals and gaskets will leak. I've run Mobile 1 10-30
> weight in my 94 Sub since it was new(with the exception of once when I
was in
> a pinch) and would highly recommend it as well. Unless you live somewhere
> like Prudhoe Bay, I also think 10-30 will be fine. I've run all over the
> western US in all kinds of weather without problem.
> : The problems with switching between synthetics and regular oil have been
> overcome in recent years.
> : There should be no problems doing so; I however, have not found any strong
> evidence to indcate
> : that there is any real advantage in running synthetic as opposed to using
> good quality oil and
> : changing it every 3K.
> Your not going to notice the difference until you open the engine and
look at
> the wear. My uncle works on helicopter engines and they have to be sent back
> to the factory after so many hours of flight to be rebuilt. One of the
> engines they had sent in had run Mobil 1 all its life. The engine that had
> the Mobil 1 got sent back saying that they hadn't ever run the engine, there
> was no wear. Now I don't know if my uncle was pulling my leg, but the FAA
> allowed synthetics to be used after that story was told to me. I have never
> used anything but Mobil 1.
I don't believe that Mobil 1 was ever "black". That was an oil with graphite
additive that was sold by Atlantic Richfield many moons ago. Now what was the
name of that stuff? Can't remember, but nobody is going to put black oil INTO
an engine; that's the color when you need to take it out!! Doomed from the
start, no matter how good it might have been. What were those marketing guys
thinking!!
Hope you're having a nice day!
Bob
At 04:06 PM 5/16/98 +0100, you wrote:
>Bob,
>
>Since my catalog lists fans like that in 17" sizes, I would be interested in
>whose 14" model you think is a good fit. While I can concur about the
diameter
>blockage of the flat motor, it is light. The fans of the "curved blade"
model
>are terminated in a stiffening ring and the straight bladed fans I've seen
have
>open tips. This is structurally a poor practice from a stiffness standpoint,
>and blade vibration. The curved blade Hayden also has an integral shroud
that
>works with the ringed blades to be an efficient duct as well as seal against
the
>radiator. So I would really like a reference to a brand and model of a
straight
>blade, small diameter motor you consider better so that I can look it over.
>
>As to the Mobil 1 story. I, too, was a little surprised by it. I believe
they
>are referring to a special jet lubricant, not the sutff for cars. While I
>haven't put any in my engine, I did put the gear oil version of it in my
>top-loader after 1,000 mile "wear-in" if some new components. The shifting
>changed immediately to "real slick" with a stock shifter. BTW: mine was
clear,
>not black like the engine oil. Don't know how it will work on a limited
slip.
>My rear axle specialist highly recommends Swepco for the rear end. I've been
>using it in my VW Transaxle for years with no problems. I understand that a
>special additive is necessary to keep a limited slip, like the Dana, from
>chattering, and you can't get it anymore becasue it is made from whale oil.
Any
>opinions on this?
>
>Steve
>-- Steve Laifman
B9472289